Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
hope of explaining certain clinical and psychological features which would otherwise be incomprehensible to non-Arabs. Since the modal characteristics of Arabs vary so much from one community to an-other, the validity of generalisations about Arabs as a whole, like that of the idea of a unitary national character, can be doubted. Unjustifiable generalisations have characterised the Arabs as dquo;human but not humanedquo; (66), as hypocritically dquo;substituting ritual for righteousnessdquo; (74), or as dquo;granting mysterious and overwhelming power to the one in exchange for total security to the other ( 65). Another source of error in this area is the inadvertent attribution of the personal and interpersonal dquo;characteristicsdquo; of today’s Arabs to the Islamic code of values and behaviour ( 65, 74). Nevertheless, there are certain widely shared features of general relevance to psychiatry which can be recognised, namely traditional beliefs re-garding spirits and the evil eye, family structure and relationships,
M. Fakhr El‐Islam (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: