Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract Research into the translation of cultural references (CRs) often focuses on the analysis of selected CR translations or particular lexical sub-fields such as proper names or geographical terms. In most cases the procedures the translator has used are described and labeled, then critically evaluated and/or used to identify ‘foreignization’ or ‘domestication’ tendencies in the translator's approach to handling the cultural load of a text. This article argues that selective analysis of this kind may give undue weight to the selected examples or lexical sub-fields while ignoring other items. The article will therefore put forward that the validity of studies, especially those featuring a comparative element, could be enhanced by complementing selective and focused approaches with more comprehensive quantitative data. An empirical study which explored CR translation from a quantitative perspective will be described as an example to suggest a framework of quantitative analysis in CR translation and issues arising from the study will be discussed.
Harald Olk (Thu,) studied this question.