PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 15, 2014European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry45 citationsOpen Access

Spin‐State Energetics of FeII Complexes – The Continuing Voyage Through the Density Functional Minefield

View Full Paper
BHB. J. HoughtonRDRobert J. Deeth

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Computing absolute spin‐state energies continues to challenge quantum chemistry. Correlated wavefunction methods offer high accuracy but are expensive, whereas density functional theory (DFT) is faster, but its accuracy is variable. No “universal” functional has emerged, but predicting trends in spin‐state energies is easier. Here, a simple DFT protocol is applied to the subtle variations in magnetic moments for Fe II – R,R′ Pytacn complexes ( Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52 , 9229). Both BP86 and OPBE give satisfactory correlation coefficients ( R 2 = 0.87 and 0.75, respectively), whereas the range‐separated functional CAM‐B3LYP performs worse ( R 2 = 0.37). However, even for BP86 and OPBE, the p ‐CO 2 Et substituent is predicted to be too electron‐donating. The relatively poor performance of CAM‐B3LYP may be due to the more exacting test of DFT provided by mixed‐ligand systems, where the competition between donors is an additional factor.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Houghton et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d3c037328fa9a742f2e2ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201402253
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper