Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
ABSTRACT This study focuses on the organizational adoption of Executive Information Systems (EIS). A distinction is made between two related, complementary EIS capabilities—EIS for collaboration support (EIS c ) and EIS for decision support (EIS d ). EIS c is relatively standardized and replicable, while EIS d has to be developed in situ given the specific characteristics of the user and task. The adoption process is conceptualized as an initial transition from a state of nonadoption to adoption (adoption status) and subsequent internal propagation of the technology (adoption level). Data collected from a national survey are used to test hypotheses between identified contextual variables and the adoption status and adoption level of EIS c and EIS d . Adopters and nonadopters of both EIS c and EIS d do not differ in their organization size, suggesting that the traditional paradigm of “EIS as a technology for large firms” is no longer true. Environmental uncertainty is found to promote the transition from a state of nonadoption to adoption of both EIS c and EIS d while continuing to catalyze the internal propagation of EIS d . While no differences are observed in IS department size between adopters and nonadopters of EIS c , our results suggest that larger IS departments provide the resource base to explore the less standardized of the two capabilities, EIS d . IS support is also found to be critical for the subsequent internal propagation of EIS d . Furthermore, the adoption level of both EIS c and EIS d are found to be promoted by top management support. Implications of these results are discussed for the organizational adoption of EIS.
Rai et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: