Inicio
Explorar
nav.journalClub
Tendencias
Más
synapse
⌘+K
Idioma
Español
Español
Non-Biopsy Diagnosis of ATTR-CM: How Safe Is ‘Non-Invasive’? | Synapse
June 2, 2026
Non-Biopsy Diagnosis of ATTR-CM: How Safe Is ‘Non-Invasive’?
AP
Aldostefano Porcari
ERN GUARD-Heart
MM
M Merlo
University of Verona
DT
Daniela Tomasoni
Heart Failure & Transplant
Puntos clave
Evaluate the safety and accuracy of non-invasive diagnostic methods for ATTR-CM compared to biopsy.
Conducted a randomized trial with a control group using imaging techniques and serum biomarkers.
Included a diverse population suspected of having ATTR-CM.
Followed up with participants to assess diagnostic outcomes and safety.
Non-invasive methods demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 85% (95% CI: 75-95), P=0.01.
Reported adverse events associated with non-invasive methods were minimal, with a 2% event rate.
Highlighting the potential for non-invasive approaches to reduce the need for biopsy in diagnosing ATTR-CM.
Mark Helpful
Me gusta
Save
Guardar
Relay
Compartir
Mark Helpful
Me gusta
Save
Guardar
Relay
Compartir
Cite This Study
Copy
Porcari et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e73df30b38c64201b68f0
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ejhf/xuag170