Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract 12 subjects were tested twice on a one-hour visual vigilance task. 6 subjects first performed the teat accompanied by continuous white noise presented at 72 dB (A). The second time they performed the test it was accompanied by music, presented at a level previously calibrated to give an. average integrated output, over one hour, of 72 dB A. A further 6 subjects performed the two tests in the reverse order. Performance was analysed into hits and false alarms at 3 levels of confidence for report. Although raw score performance did not differ between conditions, a signal detection theory analysis showed that diseriminability was higher in white noise than music. The setting of the cautious criterion showed an interaction between noise conditions and time on task.
Hartley et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: