Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract We are interested in testing Ψ = 0 against an alternative in the presence of some nuisance parameter λ. The usual procedure for such problems is to use a test statistic that is a function of the data only. Let q (λ) denote the p-value at a given value λ. If q (λ) does not depend on λ, then in principle we can apply this procedure. However, a major difficulty that arises in many situations is that q (λ) depends on λ and therefore cannot be used as a p-value. In such cases, the usual approach is to define the p-value as the supremum of q (λ) over the nuisance parameter space. Because this approach ignores sample information about λ, it may be unnecessarily conservative; this is a serious problem in order restricted inference. To overcome this, I propose the following. Obtain, say, a 99% confidence region for λ under the null hypothesis. Now, for a given λ, let T (λ) be a test statistic and r (λ) be the p-value. The test procedure is to reject the null hypothesis if 0. 01 + supremum of r (λ) over the 99% confidence region for λ is less than the nominal level such as 0. 05. In contrast to the usual procedure, an attractive feature of this procedure is that it allows us to choose a test statistic as a function of λ. A data example is used to illustrate the procedure in a simulation study I observed that this test performed better than the traditional conservative procedure. Although this approach was originally developed for order restricted inference problems, the main results have wide applicability.
Mervyn J. Silvapulle (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: