Smartphone-holder use during motorcycling is increasingly common, but its task-dependent ergonomic effects remain insufficiently understood. This study examined visual, postural, and muscular responses during smartphone-holder use under a simulated riding-posture condition. Forty healthy adults completed five smartphone-use tasks: dynamic viewing, static viewing, texting, seated use, and standing use. Each riding-related task condition lasted one minute, with the final 30 s designated as the stable data collection window. For postural variables, instantaneous values were recorded at four time points (0, 10, 20, and 30 s from the onset of the stable window) and averaged. For electromyography (EMG), integrated EMG (IEMG) was computed over the same 30 s window using ten consecutive non-overlapping 3 s epochs, and averaged for normalization. The neck flexion (NF), upper thoracic angle (UTA), gaze angle (GA), viewing distance (VD), and electromyographic activities of the cervical erector spinae (CES) and upper trapezius (UTZ) were measured using integrated motion-analysis and EMG approaches. Two-way mixed ANOVA and repeated-measures correlation analyses were performed. The task condition significantly affected all measured variables, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large (all ηp2 ≥ 0.155), with texting producing the greatest NF, shortest VD, and highest muscle activation. Strong within-subject associations were identified among visual, postural, and muscular variables across riding-related tasks (VD–NF: r = −0.815, p < 0.001). Females exhibited higher CES and UTZ activation than males. These findings reveal a task-dependent visual–postural–muscular co-variation pattern during scooter-mounted smartphone-holder use and support the application of a sensor-based ergonomic assessment for characterizing task-dependent visual–postural–muscular responses during scooter-mounted smartphone-holder use.
Chen et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: