Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Naming can alternatively be a definition of identity or a source of stigma. Un-naming can alter a story and serve to unhinge fixed definitions, initiating a democratic discourse that finds its own way of escaping the thrall of hegemony and dominating canons. Can qualitative research serve to un-name axiomatic frameworks of identity? This article is written to follow up to the author’s Messing Around With Identity Constructs and continues his effort to establish the efficacy of a poststructural and poetic aesthetic in research writing.
James Haywood Rolling (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: