Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
In the early cold war the British government founded a voluntary civil defence service designed to protect the nation and the population from the effects of enemy attack in the event of war.Although civil defence was a site of massive voluntary effort -around 500,000 people joinedit was also considered a 'failure'.This article examines the propaganda utilised to recruit these volunteers in the 'atomic age', and argues that the messages used reveal a range of concerns about the conflict, patriotism and voluntarism in the early postwar years which existed in tension.In particular, it analyses the tensions between duty and service on the one hand, and leisure on the other, symptomatic of the wider debates surrounding citizenship and participation in the period.It also explains the importance of the Second World War and the gendered perceptions of civil defence in attempting to mobilise potential recruits.The article concludes that civil defence propaganda succeeded in mobilising significant levels of participation, but was perceived as failure due to an understanding of patriotic citizenship rooted in the cultural context of the Second World War.In a period of cultural change, propaganda began to emphasise leisure as well as duty, but struggled to reconcile the two messages in a way capable of convincing recruits in large enough numbers.
Matthew Grant (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: