Continuous ECG monitoring with an implantable loop recorder was superior to intermittent handheld ECG for detecting atrial fibrillation after discharge (100% vs 45% of cases; P=0.001).
Cohort (n=40)
Does continuous ECG monitoring with an implantable loop recorder improve the detection of incident and recurrent atrial fibrillation compared to intermittent handheld ECG in patients after CABG surgery?
Continuous ECG monitoring with an implantable loop recorder is superior to intermittent handheld ECG for detecting incident and recurrent atrial fibrillation after CABG surgery.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 100% vs 45%
valor p: p=.001
BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is common after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence and recurrence rate of AF during 1 year after CABG surgery. We also aimed at calculating the AF burden and compare long-term intermittent vs continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring.MethodsForty patients scheduled for CABG surgery were equipped with an implantable loop recorder (ILR). After discharge, they carried out handheld ECG 3 times daily during the first 30 postoperative days and during 2 weeks at 3 and 12 months. During hospital stay they were monitored with telemetry.ResultsAltogether 27 of 40 (68%) patients were diagnosed with AF, 24 during the first month (21 in-hospital and 3 after discharge) and 3 during months 2–12. Three patients progressed into persistent AF. In addition, 17 patients had AF recurrence, 9 of them after the first 30 days. In patients with paroxysmal AF, the AF burden was low, 0.1% (interquartile range IQR 0.02%–0.3%). Patients with AF had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores than non-AF patients: median 4 (IQR 3–4) and 3 (IQR 2–3.5), respectively, P = .006. The handheld ECG identified 45% (9/20) of the patients with AF episodes identified with continuous ECG monitoring with the ILR after discharge from hospital, P = .001.ConclusionsPatients with AF during the postoperative hospitalization showed a high likelihood of recurrent AF, usually within 30 days. Continuous ECG monitoring with an ILR was superior to the handheld ECG for detecting patients with AF. The AF burden was low. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. To evaluate the incidence and recurrence rate of AF during 1 year after CABG surgery. We also aimed at calculating the AF burden and compare long-term intermittent vs continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. Forty patients scheduled for CABG surgery were equipped with an implantable loop recorder (ILR). After discharge, they carried out handheld ECG 3 times daily during the first 30 postoperative days and during 2 weeks at 3 and 12 months. During hospital stay they were monitored with telemetry. Altogether 27 of 40 (68%) patients were diagnosed with AF, 24 during the first month (21 in-hospital and 3 after discharge) and 3 during months 2–12. Three patients progressed into persistent AF. In addition, 17 patients had AF recurrence, 9 of them after the first 30 days. In patients with paroxysmal AF, the AF burden was low, 0.1% (interquartile range IQR 0.02%–0.3%). Patients with AF had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores than non-AF patients: median 4 (IQR 3–4) and 3 (IQR 2–3.5), respectively, P = .006. The handheld ECG identified 45% (9/20) of the patients with AF episodes identified with continuous ECG monitoring with the ILR after discharge from hospital, P = .001. Patients with AF during the postoperative hospitalization showed a high likelihood of recurrent AF, usually within 30 days. Continuous ECG monitoring with an ILR was superior to the handheld ECG for detecting patients with AF. The AF burden was low.
Sandgren et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (n=40). Continuous ECG monitoring with an implantable loop recorder vs. Intermittent handheld ECG was evaluated on Detection of patients with atrial fibrillation after discharge (p=.001). Continuous ECG monitoring with an implantable loop recorder was superior to intermittent handheld ECG for detecting atrial fibrillation after discharge (100% vs 45% of cases; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: