The Physiological Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (PESAS) accurately predicted 30-day mortality in emergency surgery patients, demonstrating a c-statistic of 0.80.
Observational (n=24,702)
Does the Physiological Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (PESAS) accurately predict 30-day mortality in patients undergoing emergency surgery?
The novel Physiological Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (PESAS) accurately predicts 30-day mortality in emergency surgery patients, which may aid in preoperative counseling and risk-adjusted benchmarking.
Estimación del efecto: c-statistic 0.80
BACKGROUND: We present a novel and abbreviated Physiological Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (PESAS) that assesses the severity of disease at presentation in patients undergoing Emergency Surgery (ES). METHODS: Using the 2011 ACS-NSQIP database, we identified all patients who underwent "emergent" surgery. The following methodology was designed: (1) identification of independent predictors of 30-day mortality that are markers of acuity; (2) derivation of PESAS based on the relative impact (i.e., odds ratio) of each predictor; and (3) measurement of the c-statistic. The PESAS was validated using the 2012 ACS-NSQIP database. RESULTS: From 24,702 ES cases, a 15-point score was derived. This included 10 components with a range of 0 and 15 points. Its c-statistic was 0.80. Mortality gradually increased from 1.7 to 40.6 to 100% at scores of 0, 8, and 15, respectively. In the validation phase, PESAS c-statistic remained stable. CONCLUSION: PESAS is a novel score that assesses the acuity of disease at presentation in ES patients and strongly correlates with postoperative mortality risk. PESAS could prove useful for preoperative counseling and for risk-adjusted benchmarking.
Sangji et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Emergency Surgery (n=24,702). Physiological Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (PESAS) was evaluated on 30-day mortality (c-statistic 0.80). The Physiological Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (PESAS) accurately predicted 30-day mortality in emergency surgery patients, demonstrating a c-statistic of 0.80.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: