Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract Purpose Appropriate positioning and alignment of tibial and femoral component in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are factors of major importance directly related to patient satisfaction and implant survival. Most literature works elaborate on overall post‐operative alignment and its correlation to implant survival. However, less is known about the impact of individual component alignment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of undercorrection of overall alignment as well as the effect of individual tibial and femoral component alignment on the post‐operative failure rate after total knee arthroplasty. Methods Clinical and radiographic data of primary TKA cases from 2002 to 2004, with a minimum of 10‐year follow‐up, were retrospectively reviewed. The pre‐ and post‐operative hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured on weight‐bearing, full‐length antero‐posterior lower limb radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed to establish the correlation between both overall and implant alignment and revision rate. Results In total, 379 primary TKA cases were evaluated. The mean time of follow‐up was 12.9 years (range 10.3–15.9 years, SD = 1.8). Nine out of 379 cases were revised due to aseptic loosening; the mean time to revision was 5.5 years (range 1.0–15.5 years, SD = 4.6). Varus undercorrection of overall alignment was not associated with a higher rate of revision ( p = 0.316). Post‐operative valgus femoral alignment (mLDFA 3° of valgus (mLDFA < 87°). In contrast, postoperative overall residual varus alignment (HKA) and varus alignment of the tibial component were not related to higher revision rates at a minimum 10‐year follow‐up after TKA. These findings should be considered when choosing component position in individualised TKA. Level of evidence III.
Luyckx et al. (Mon,) studied this question.