Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract Why are villages that are geographically so close together economically so far apart? This question is examined using a survey of 1000 households in seven villages in Hebei province, China. An answer is developed in terms of factor immobility and processes of cumulative causation. Although a good natural resource endowment helps to initiate the process, the main cause of differential village development is non‐farm sources of income: migration and village industry. Both are constrained and the easing of the constraints involves path‐dependent cumulative processes. For instance, migration requires a village network of information and contacts, and village industrialization depends on the accumulation of local skills through a process of learning‐by‐doing and on the reinvestment of profits. There is a case for mesoeconomic analysis at the village level in China and in other poor countries.
Knight et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: