February 19, 2014

Informed Consent, Comparative Effectiveness, and Learning Health Care

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

The authors argue that in a learning health care system with ethically robust oversight policies, a streamlined consent process could replace formal written informed-consent procedures for many studies, and patient consent would not be required at all for some trials.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Cite This Study

Faden et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20f5d9b9c39a5cf6ecbdeb https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmhle1313674

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Ethics and Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research With Prospective Electronic Clinical Data2013 · 76 citations
2An Ethics Framework for a Learning Health Care System: <i>A Departure from Traditional Research Ethics and Clinical Ethics</i>2013 · 501 citations
3Is Informed Consent Always Necessary for Randomized, Controlled Trials?1999 · 195 citations
4The Research‐Treatment Distinction:<i>A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight</i>2013 · 233 citations
5Randomized, controlled trials as minimal risk: An ethical analysis*2007 · 28 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar