The built environment in Saudi Arabia accounts for approximately 78% of the country’s total electricity consumption, positioning building energy performance as one of the most consequential levers available to policymakers pursuing the kingdom’s net-zero greenhouse gas emissions target for 2060 and Vision 2030’s sustainability agenda. Despite the progressive introduction of the Saudi Building Code (SBC) energy chapters SBC 601, SBC 602, and the Saudi Green Building Code (SgBC 1001), a persistent gap remains between regulatory intent and measurable outcomes across Saudi Arabia’s five distinct climatic zones. Building codes are, by design, generic policy instruments encompassing structural, fire, accessibility, and energy provisions; this paper focuses specifically on the energy and sustainability dimensions and critically examines how the SBC’s update cycle and prescriptive compliance architecture shape actual performance outcomes. This study presents three explicit research questions: (RQ1) What zone-differentiated energy savings does SBC implementation deliver across residential typologies? (RQ2) How does the Mostadam national rating system compare with international benchmarks in the Saudi context, and what caveats govern that comparison? (RQ3) What evidence-based policy interventions are needed to transition from compliance-led to performance-led building energy governance? Drawing on a systematic synthesis of 53 building energy simulation models (2018–2025), official programme data, and a structured comparative analysis of Mostadam against LEED v4.1 and BREEAM, the study finds EUI reductions of 5–25% from SBC compliance, with the largest savings in the hot–humid coastal zone. Seven prioritised policy recommendations are proposed, addressing code revision, financial incentives, digital monitoring, renewable energy thresholds, and capacity building.
Fahad S. Allahaim (Fri,) studied this question.