A novel ELISA assay for determining asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) levels showed good correlation with LC-tandem MS (r = 0.984; p < 0.0001).
A novel ELISA assay for ADMA demonstrates high precision and strong correlation with LC-MS, offering an easier alternative for biomarker quantification.
Estimación del efecto: r = 0.984
valor p: p=< 0.0001
Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is an endogenous competitive inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Elevated ADMA plasma levels have been reported in connection with diseases associated with an impaired endothelial L-arginine-NO pathway and endothelial dysfunction, such as atherosclerosis, hypercholesterolemia, chronic heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. NO production by NOS is decreased due to elevated ADMA levels. In fact, there is increasing interest in determination of ADMA levels in samples of various origins. The aim of this work was to develop a precise and easy immunoassay in contrast to the existing methods, such as HPLC, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and gas chromatography (GC)-MS. We determined cross-reactivity in our immunoassay of 1.2% for symmetric dimethylarginine and <0.02% for L-arginine. The limit of quantitation was 0.05 micromol/l. We found good correlation of the values measured when we compared our assay with LC-tandem MS (n = 29; r = 0.984; p < 0.0001). We determined ADMA levels in human serum and plasma, mouse and rat plasma, and cell culture supernatant. For human plasma we found a mean of 0.65 micromol/l in healthy subjects. In the plasma of mice and rats we found mean concentrations of 1.05 and 1.09 micromol/l, respectively.
Schulze et al. (Thu,) reported a other. Novel ELISA assay for ADMA vs. LC-tandem MS was evaluated on Correlation between novel ELISA assay and LC-tandem MS (r = 0.984, p=< 0.0001). A novel ELISA assay for determining asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) levels showed good correlation with LC-tandem MS (r = 0.984; p < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: