PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 7, 2004Journal of Applied Physiology70 citations

Age and regional specificity of peak limb vascular conductance in men

View Full Paper
DPDavid N. ProctorKLKhoi U. LeSRSamuel J. Ridout

Key Points

  • To evaluate how peak limb vascular conductance changes with age and to identify predictors of this variation.
  • Measured peak conductance in forearm and calf in 68 healthy men aged 20-79 years after arterial occlusion.

Structured PICO

Does healthy aging affect peak limb vascular conductance differently in the forearm compared to the calf in men?

P
Population
68 healthy, normally active men aged 20-79 yr
I
Intervention
Measurement of peak forearm and calf vascular conductance after 10 min of arterial occlusion
O
Outcome
Peak limb vascular conductance (VC(peak)) of the forearm and calfsurrogate

Healthy aging in men is associated with a linear decline in limb vasodilator capacity, with a greater magnitude of decline in the forearm compared to the calf.

Abstract

Because of methodological variation in previous studies, age-associated changes in peak limb vascular conductance (VC(peak); a functional index of arterial structure) and its determinants remain poorly defined. The objectives of this study were to describe and compare age-associated changes in peak forearm and calf conductance across a broad age range and to identify physiological characteristics that are predictive of variation in limb-specific VC(peak). Peak conductance (plethysmographic flow/brachial mean arterial pressure) of the forearm (forearm VC(peak)) and calf (calf VC(peak)) after 10 min of arterial occlusion was measured twice in 68 healthy, normally active men aged 20-79 yr. Aerobic capacity (cycle peak oxygen consumption), arterial health (ankle-brachial index, pulse wave velocity), and limb-specific measures of muscle mass (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and isometric strength (grip, plantar flexion) were also assessed. The relative decline in forearm VC(peak) with age (-6.6% per decade; P < 0.001) was greater than the decline in calf VC(peak) (-3.4% per decade; P = 0.004). Limb VC(peak) per kilogram of muscle declined with age in the forearm (-3.8% per decade; P = 0.004) but not in the calf (P = 0.35). Age, Vo(2 peak), and regional muscle mass were significant predictors of peak conductance in both limbs; however, these predictors explained considerably less variance in the calf than in the forearm. These results suggest that healthy aging is associated with a linear decline in limb vasodilator capacity in men, but the magnitude of this effect is reduced in the calf relative to the forearm. This could reflect regional differences in habitual muscle use with aging in normally active men.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Proctor et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2135afff77b76b85343289https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00704.2004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper