Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
For decades, mathematics education pedagogy has relied most heavily on teachers, demonstrating correctly worked example exercises as models for students to follow while practicing their own exercises. In more recent years, incorrect exercises have been introduced for the purpose of student-conducted error analysis. Combining the use of correctly worked exercises with error analysis has led researchers to posit increased mathematical understanding. Combining the use of correctly worked exercises with error analysis has led researchers to posit increased mathematical understanding. A mixed method design was used to investigate the use of error analysis in a seventh-grade mathematics unit on equations and inequalities. Quantitative data were used to establish statistical significance of the effectiveness of using error analysis and qualitative methods were used to understand participants’ experience with error analysis. The results determined that there was no significant difference in posttest scores. However, there was a significant difference in delayed posttest scores. In general, the teacher and students found the use of error analysis to be beneficial in the learning process.
Sheryl J. Rushton (Tue,) studied this question.