A novel parameter based on heart rate and body acceleration (TEE-pulse) accurately estimated maximal oxygen uptake in free-living conditions (RMSE: 367 mL O2/min, or 12%).
Observational (n=37)
Can heart rate and body acceleration measurements accurately estimate cardiorespiratory fitness (V̇o2max) in daily life compared to maximal exercise testing?
Heart rate and body acceleration data collected during daily life can accurately estimate cardiorespiratory fitness (V̇o2max) using activity-specific prediction equations.
Estimación del efecto: RMSE: 367 mL O2/min (12%)
Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) increases risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. Periodic CRF assessment can have an important preventive function. The objective of this study was to develop a protocol-free method to estimate CRF in daily life based on heart rate (HR) and body acceleration measurements. Acceleration and HR data were collected from 37 subjects (men = 49%) while they performed a standardized laboratory activity protocol (sitting, walking, running, cycling) and during a 5-day free-living monitoring period. CRF was determined by oxygen uptake (V̇o 2max ) during maximal exercise testing. A doubly labeled water-validated equation was used to predict total energy expenditure (TEE) from acceleration data. A fitness index was defined as the ratio between TEE and HR (TEE-pulse). Activity recognition techniques were used to process acceleration features and classify sedentary, ambulatory, and other activity types. Regression equations based on TEE-pulse data from each activity type were developed to predict V̇o 2max . TEE-pulse measured within each activity type of the laboratory protocol was highly correlated with V̇o 2max ( r from 0.74–0.91). Averaging the outcome of each activity-type specific equation based on TEE-pulse from the laboratory data led to accurate estimates of V̇o 2max root mean square error (RMSE): 300 mL O 2 /min, or 10%. The difference between laboratory and free-living determined TEE-pulse was 3.7 ± 11% ( r = 0.85). The prediction method preserved the prediction accuracy when applied to free-living data (RMSE: 367 mL O 2 /min, or 12%). Measurements of body acceleration and HR can be used to predict V̇o 2max in daily life. Activity-specific prediction equations are needed to achieve highly accurate estimates of CRF. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is among the very few studies validating, in free-living conditions, a method to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness using heart rate and body acceleration data. A novel parameter called TEE-pulse, which was defined as the ratio between accelerometer-determined energy expenditure and heart rate, was highly correlated with maximal oxygen uptake (V̇o 2max ). Activity classification and the use of activity-selective prediction equations outperformed previously published methods for estimating V̇o 2max from heart rate and acceleration data.
Bonomi et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Cardiorespiratory fitness (n=37). Heart rate and body acceleration measurements (TEE-pulse) vs. Maximal exercise testing (V̇o2max) was evaluated on Estimation of V̇o2max in free-living conditions (RMSE: 367 mL O2/min (12%)). A novel parameter based on heart rate and body acceleration (TEE-pulse) accurately estimated maximal oxygen uptake in free-living conditions (RMSE: 367 mL O2/min, or 12%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: