Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract Finding the genetic factors of complex diseases such as can-cer, currently a major effort of the international community, will potentially lead to better treatment of these diseases. One of the major difficulties in these studies, is the fact that the genetic components of an individual not only depend onthe disease, but also on its ethnicity. Therefore, it is crucial to find methods that could reduce the population structureeffects on these studies. This can be formalized as a clustering problem, where the individuals are clustered accordingto their genetic information. Mathematically, we consider the problem of clusteringbit quot;feature quot; vectors, where each vector represents the genetic information of an individual. Our model assumes thatthis bit vector is generated according to a prior probability distribution specified by the individuals membership in apopulation. We present methods that can cluster the vectors while attempting to optimize the number of featuresrequired. The focus of the paper is not on the algorithms, but on showing that optimizing certain objective functionson the data yields the right clustering, under the random generative model. In particular, we prove that some of theprevious formulations for clustering are effective. We consider two different clustering approaches. Thefirst approach forms a graph, and then clusters the data using a connected components algorithm, or a max cut algo-rithm. The second approach tries to estimate simultanously the feature frequencies in each of the populations, and theclassification of vectors into populations. We show that using the first approach \ (log N/fl2) data (i. e. , total numberof features times number of vectors) is sufficient to find the correct classification, where N is the number of vectors of each population, and fl is the average `22 distance betweenthe feature probability vectors of the two populations. Using the second approach, we show that O (log N/ff4) datais enough, where ff is the average ` 1 distance between thepopulations.
Chaudhuri et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: