Home- and community-based services were associated with a lower risk of mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients <85 years (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.38-0.99), but not in those ≥85 years.
Cohort
Sí
Do home- and community-based services reduce the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients aged ≥65 years with acute heart failure?
Home- and community-based services may reduce mortality and heart failure readmissions in elderly (but not super-elderly) patients with acute heart failure.
Hazard Ratio: 0.62 (95% CI 0.38–0.99)
AIM: In Japan, the long-term care insurance (LTCI) system is important for elderly people living at home; however, no clinical studies have revealed a relationship between home- or community-based services and outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter cohort study of patients with AHF enrolled between April 2015 and August 2017. Patients aged ≥65 years with LTCI were divided into those receiving home- and community-based services (service users) and without home and community-based services (service non-users). The endpoint was defined as a composite endpoint, which included all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure after discharge. Subgroup analyses were performed for elderly patients (<85 years) or super-elderly patients (≥85 years). RESULTS: The study participants were eligible for LTCI two times more than community-dwelling people were. At the 1-year follow-up period, the rate of the composite endpoint showed no significant difference between service users and service non-users among all patients or super-elderly patients. However, in elderly patients, the rate of the composite endpoint was significantly lower among service users than service non-users. The difference was independently maintained even after adjustments for differences in comorbidities or in social backgrounds (adjusted hazard ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.99, and adjusted hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.90, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, adverse events following discharge of patients with AHF who used home- and community-based services were prevented only in elderly patients, not in super-elderly patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 967-973.
Takabayashi et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in acute heart failure. Home- and community-based services vs. No home- and community-based services was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure after discharge (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.38-0.99). Home- and community-based services were associated with a lower risk of mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients <85 years (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.38-0.99), but not in those ≥85 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: