PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2009Hypertension in Pregnancy69 citations

Validation and Compliance of a Home Monitoring Device in Pregnancy: Microlife WatchBP Home

View Full Paper
YCYealin ChungAGAnnemarie de GreeffASAndrew Shennan

Key Result

The Microlife WatchBP Home device demonstrated accuracy in pregnancy (mean difference 0.4/-0.4 mmHg) and preeclampsia (-2.6/0.8 mmHg), with 81% of women performing at least 6 measurements per day.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=66)

Structured PICO

Is the Microlife WatchBP Home device accurate and associated with good patient compliance for blood pressure monitoring in high-risk pregnancy?

P
Population
45 pregnant women (including 15 with preeclampsia) assessed for device accuracy, and 21 high-risk pregnant women assessed for compliance.
E
Exposure
Microlife WatchBP Home blood pressure monitoring device
C
Comparator
British Hypertension Society protocol standard
O
Outcome
Device accuracy (mean difference +/- SD for systolic/diastolic pressure) and patient compliance (measurements per day/week)surrogate

The Microlife WatchBP Home device provides accurate blood pressure measurements in pregnancy and preeclampsia, with high patient compliance.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy and patient compliance in using a novel home blood pressure monitoring device in high-risk pregnancy. METHODS: Device accuracy was assessed according to the British Hypertension Society protocol in 45 pregnant women, including 15 with preeclampsia. Twenty-one high-risk pregnant women used the device in addition to their antenatal care. RESULTS: The device achieved a mean difference +/- SD of 0.4 +/- 7.3/-0.4 +/- 5.5 mmHg (pregnancy) and -2.6 +/- 7.0/0.8 +/- 4.4 mmHg (preeclampsia) for systolic/diastolic pressure. Eighty-one percent of women did at least 6 measurements/day and all women did at least 2 measurements/week. CONCLUSION: The Microlife WatchBP Home is accurate for use in pregnancy and increases surveillance in compliant patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chung et al. (2009) conducted an observational in High-risk pregnancy and preeclampsia (n=66). Microlife WatchBP Home blood pressure monitoring device was evaluated on Device accuracy (mean difference for systolic/diastolic pressure) and patient compliance. The Microlife WatchBP Home device demonstrated accuracy in pregnancy (mean difference 0.4/-0.4 mmHg) and preeclampsia (-2.6/0.8 mmHg), with 81% of women performing at least 6 measurements per day.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22582559bf42cc6a7c939chttps://doi.org/10.1080/10641950802601286
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Validation of a Remote Monitoring Blood Pressure Device in Pregnancy2023 · 4 citations
  2. 2An accurate automated blood pressure device for use in pregnancy and pre‐eclampsia: the Microlife 3BTO‐A2005 · 112 citations
  3. 3Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor for use in pregnancy1993 · 123 citations
  4. 4Validation of the Welch Allyn ‘Vital Signs’ blood pressure measurement device in pregnancy and pre‐eclampsia2003 · 37 citations
  5. 5Self-monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy2017 · 4 citations