High Life's Essential 8 scores were associated with a 77% reduction in total cardiovascular disease risk compared to low scores (OR 0.23).
Cross-Sectional (n=22,298)
Do higher Life's Essential 8 scores reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in US adults?
22,298 US adults aged 20 years and older from the NHANES 2005-2018 database were evaluated to assess the cross-sectional association between Life's Essential 8 scores and cardiovascular disease risk.
Moderate (50-79) and high (80-100) Life's Essential 8 (LE8) scores
Low (0-49) Life's Essential 8 (LE8) scores
Total cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, defined as self-reported physician diagnosis of congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, heart attack, or strokecomposite
Higher adherence to Life's Essential 8 metrics is associated with a strong, dose-dependent reduction in the risk of cardiovascular disease in US adults.
Odds Ratio: 0.23 (95% CI 0.18–0.3)
valor p: p=<0.001
Background: Cardiovascular health (CVH) is closely linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD)-specific mortality, yet research on Life's Essential 8 (LE8), a new CVH indicator, and its association with CVD risk is limited. Objective: This study aims to explore the association between LE8 and CVD risk in US adults. Methods: A total of 22,298 participants were included in this cross-sectional study from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2005 and 2018. LE8 scores were categorized into low, moderate, and high groups. Multivariate logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) models were employed to examine the association between LE8 scores and CVD risk. Results: In the multivariate-adjusted model, individuals with moderate and high LE8 scores exhibited a 53% (odds ratio OR = 0.47, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.41-0.54) and 77% (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.18-0.30) reduction in total CVD risk compared to those with low LE8 scores. RCS analyses revealed an inverse dose-response relationship between LE8 scores and total CVD risk. A consistently negative association was observed between LE8 scores and the risk of CVD subtypes, including congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, heart attack, and stroke. Subgroup analyses indicated a more pronounced inverse association between LE8 scores and total CVD risk among participants under 50 years old and with a family history of CVD. Conclusions: These findings suggest a strong inverse relationship between LE8 and CVD risk. Improving CVH through adherence to LE8 guidelines has significant potential to reduce the burden of CVD.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jia Li
Kaiser Permanente
Qi Ge
Jiangsu University
Yajing Liu
Shenyang Pharmaceutical University
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Wuhan No.1 Hospital
The Fourth People's Hospital
First Hospital of Xi'an
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Li et al. (Fri,) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=22,298). High Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score (80-100) vs. Low LE8 score (0-49) was evaluated on Total cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.18-0.30, p=<0.001). High Life's Essential 8 scores were associated with a 77% reduction in total cardiovascular disease risk compared to low scores (OR 0.23).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2299daa1bd7ea8dd11942e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1498240