Stentless valve replacement significantly improved early postoperative left ventricular fractional shortening compared with stented valves (25.6% vs 17.0%, P<0.001).
Cohort (n=33)
Does stentless aortic valve replacement improve early LV systolic function compared to stented valves in patients with significant aortic stenosis and impaired LV function?
Stentless aortic valve replacement provides significantly greater early improvement in LV systolic function compared to stented valves in patients with aortic stenosis and poor LV function.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 25.6% vs 17%
valor p: p=<0.001
Background —Long-standing aortic stenosis causes significant left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, which may progress irreversibly. In many cases, LV function can be salvaged by aortic valve surgery, although debate exists regarding the best valve prosthesis to use. Methods and Results —We studied 33 patients retrospectively who had significant aortic stenosis and impaired LV systolic function, as assessed by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Patients were assessed preoperatively and before discharge from the hospital. A total of 20 patients received a stentless (homograft or Toronto) valve, and 13, a stented valve. No patient had significant aortic regurgitation or other valvular disease. Preoperatively, fractional shortening was 18.8±5.5% in the stentless group and 18.6±3.8% in the stented group. Postoperatively, it was 25.6±6.9% ( P <0.001 compared with baseline) and 17.0±2.8%, respectively ( P <0.001 compared with stentless group). Fractional shortening improved because of a reduction in LV end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions in the stentless group. Systolic long axis function at the LV free wall also recovered, with an increase in systolic excursion and both peak shortening and lengthening rates. No change was noted in mitral valve Doppler patterns. Conclusions —Patients who received a stentless valve demonstrated a significantly greater early improvement in LV systolic function compared with those who received a stented valve.
Collinson et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis with impaired left ventricular systolic function (n=33). Stentless valve (homograft or Toronto) vs. Stented valve was evaluated on Postoperative fractional shortening (p=<0.001). Stentless valve replacement significantly improved early postoperative left ventricular fractional shortening compared with stented valves (25.6% vs 17.0%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: