January 1, 2001

Developing and Inclusive Model for Design for Deconstruction

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

A comparison of papilla dimensions in two implant types showed that papilla formation in TL implants was better than that in BL implants at the three-month postoperative interval.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Cite This Study

Philip Crowther (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a231a16dcf11962cd16f0aa https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34172/japid.2020.007

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment.1997 · 584 citations
2Retrospective clinical evaluation of an internal tube-in-tube dental implant after 4 years, with special emphasis on peri-implant bone resorption.2012 · 19 citations
3Clinical evaluation of single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: a retrospective study.1994 · 236 citations
4Palatal sliding strip flap: soft tissue management to restore maxillary anterior esthetics at stage 2 surgery: a clinical report.1999 · 39 citations
5Interdental papilla management: a review and classification of the therapeutic approaches.2004 · 90 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar