PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 24, 2008European Heart Journal244 citationsOpen Access

Transvenous removal of pacing and implantable cardiac defibrillating leads using single sheath mechanical dilatation and multiple venous approaches: high success rate and safety in more than 2000 leads

View Full Paper
MBMaria Grazia BongiorniESEzio SoldatiGZGiulio Zucchelli

Key Result

A single mechanical dilating sheath extraction technique with multiple venous approaches achieved complete removal in 98.4% of 2062 leads, with major complications in 0.7% of patients.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=1,193)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does a single mechanical dilating sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches safely and effectively remove pacing and ICD leads in patients requiring lead extraction?

P
Population
1,193 consecutive patients undergoing removal of 2,062 pacing and implantable cardiac defibrillating leads.
I
Intervention
Single mechanical dilating sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches (venous entry site approach [VEA], transvenous femoral approach [TFA], and internal transjugular approach [ITA])
O
Outcome
Lead removal success rate (complete, partial, or failed) and safety (major complications and death)safety

A single mechanical dilating sheath extraction technique using multiple venous approaches is highly effective and safe for the removal of pacing and ICD leads, achieving a 98.4% complete removal rate.

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of the present study was to describe a 10 years single-centre experience in pacing and defibrillating leads removal using an effective and safe modified mechanical dilatation technique. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a single mechanical dilating sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches. We performed a venous entry site approach (VEA) in cases of exposed leads and an alternative transvenous femoral approach (TFA) combined with an internal transjugular approach (ITA) in the presence of very tight binding sites causing failure of VEA extraction or in cases of free-floating leads. We attempted to remove 2062 leads 1825 pacing and 237 implantable cardiac defibrillating (ICD) leads; 1989 exposed at the venous entry site and 73 free-floating in 1193 consecutive patients. The VEA was effective in 1799 leads, the TFA in 28, and the ITA in 205; in the overall population, we completely removed 2032 leads (98.4%), partially removed 18 (0.9%), and failed to remove 12 leads (0.6%). Major complications were observed in eight patients (0.7%), causing three deaths (0.3%). CONCLUSION: Mechanical single sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches is effective, safe, and with a good cost effective profile for pacing and ICD leads removal.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bongiorni et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Pacing and implantable cardiac defibrillating leads requiring removal (n=1,193). Single sheath mechanical dilatation with multiple venous approaches was evaluated on Complete lead removal. A single mechanical dilating sheath extraction technique with multiple venous approaches achieved complete removal in 98.4% of 2062 leads, with major complications in 0.7% of patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23a9189c28b44ec7d33d66https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn461
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper