Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation remains underutilized, with fewer than 50% of eligible patients effectively referred despite being a class I recommendation for diverse cardiac conditions.
This editorial highlights the underutilization of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation despite strong guideline recommendations and emphasizes its importance for diverse and specialized patient subgroups.
In accordance with the guidelines established by prominent European and global cardiology associations, comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) stands as an officially endorsed and highly recommended therapeutic approach (class I recommendations; level of evidence A) for a diverse spectrum of cardiac patients. Nevertheless, it is a cause for concern to observe that fewer than 50% of eligible patients are being effectively referred for CR, whether in an outpatient or inpatient setting. Concurrently, studies reveal that a substantial proportion of individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease maintain unhealthy lifestyles and exhibit suboptimal management of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, lipid levels, and diabetes. Beyond the conventional patient profile encompassing those recovering from acute coronary syndrome with or without percutaneous coronary intervention, as well as patients who have undergone coronary or valvular surgery, contemporary CR now emphasizes specialized subgroups of patients. These include frail elderly patients, the female population with its unique considerations, individuals burdened by multiple cardiovascular comorbidities, those who have developed psychological consequences due to a cardiac illness and particularly those grappling with chronic heart failure. This editorial seeks to offer a state-of-the-art assessment of the significance and role of comprehensive CR within modern cardiology.
Lakušić et al. (Mon,) conducted a editorial in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation remains underutilized, with fewer than 50% of eligible patients effectively referred despite being a class I recommendation for diverse cardiac conditions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: