PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 8, 2026International Critical Thought0 citations

Recentering Class Struggle: A Critique of Ecological Ontology in Battistoni’s Free Gifts: Capitalism and the Politics of Nature

View Full Paper
TAT. Arnold

Key Points

  • This article analyzes Alyssa Battistoni’s arguments in Free Gifts, critiquing her ecological ontology from a Marxist perspective.
  • Critical engagement with Battistoni's concepts of suprasumption and abdication.
  • Analysis of class relations in nature-based production and subsumption.
  • Examination of contemporary eco-Marxist perspectives on class struggle.
  • Battistoni's concepts risk oversimplifying class antagonisms in ecological discussions.
  • Resistance of matter is better framed as a product of class relations, not natural processes.
  • Contemporary eco-Marxism’s ecological dialectics can diminish the role of organized class struggle.

Abstract

This article offers a critical engagement with Alyssa Battistoni’s Free Gifts: Capitalism and the Politics of Nature from within the Marxist ecological tradition. Focusing on Chapter 3, “The Natural Machine,” it argues that Battistoni’s conceptual innovations—suprasumption and abdication—risk ontologizing what Marx understood as historically specific class antagonisms. Through close engagement with Battistoni’s account of nature-based production, the article demonstrates that the unevenness she attributes to the resistance of matter is better explained as the outcome of historically specific class relations. Drawing on Raju Das’s work on forms of subsumption, the article argues that transitions between formal, real, and commercial subsumption are determined not by the stubbornness of natural processes but by the balance of class forces and the mediating role of the state. The broader tendency in contemporary eco-Marxism to displace class struggle in favour of ecological dialectics, the article concludes, produces a Marxism without a subject—one in which metabolic frictions substitute for the organized agency of the working class.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

T. Arnold (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a265b7cad53cfb9357c5188https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2026.2677867
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper