This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of robotic fruit harvesting systems, with a particular focus on the system-level integration of perception, manipulation, and fruit detachment within autonomous harvesting environments. Recent advances in machine vision, deep learning, sensor fusion, robotic end-effectors, grasping strategies, and motion planning are critically analyzed alongside cutting, pulling, and vibration-based detachment mechanisms under unstructured orchard conditions. Beyond component-level analysis, this review emphasizes the critical role of perception–action coupling and highlights key system integration challenges, including localization errors, perception-to-action latency, and environmental variability, which continue to limit reliable field deployment. In addition, orchard and pre-harvest-related factors such as canopy structure, fruit distribution, and detachment force variability are examined in relation to their direct impact on system performance, robustness, and harvesting efficiency. Furthermore, the review extends toward system-level considerations by incorporating performance evaluation metrics, economic feasibility, and scalability constraints, which are essential for transitioning robotic harvesting systems from experimental prototypes to commercially viable solutions, including practical field deployment in distributed and multi-robot harvesting systems. Emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, advanced sensing, digital agriculture, and energy-aware system design, are discussed as key enablers for achieving adaptive, data-driven, and scalable autonomous harvesting. The novelty of this work lies in proposing an integrated framework that explicitly links perception, manipulation, and detachment with orchard-level constraints and deployment requirements, thereby bridging the gap between algorithmic advancements and real-world implementation of autonomous fruit harvesting systems.
Ghonimy et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: