This paper develops a formal apparatus for the theory of social coordination, taking as its point of departure the cybernetic frameworks of W. Ross Ashby and Stafford Beer and extending them to address what those frameworks cannot see: the mechanism by which social systems produce coordination that is not merely functional but stable and resilient. The central argument is that viable social coordination requires not only the architectural conditions specified by Beer's Viable System Model — hierarchical variety absorption across five nested levels — but a qualitative property of that architecture that cybernetics cannot formalise: the orientation of agents from the function of the system (gōng) rather than from private interest (sī). This orientation, when sedimentated as second nature through formation, constitutes what the apparatus calls Sense (S) ; its dissolution produces the conditions of institutional degradation and political paralysis that characterise the contemporary Western order. The apparatus introduces the formation operator F as a two-dimensional operator — F = (F1, F2) — whose dimensions, technical capacity (D1) and gōng orientation (D2), are independent. The Sense operator is defined as S = FD2∘Z, where Z is the zoning operator. The viability condition V = T − Pₑff ≥ 0 formalises Ashby's requisite variety restriction under explicit modelling assumptions. The paper specifies four modes of aesthetic density (ρₐ, ρd, ρₑ, false ρₐ) with ex ante observable indicators; introduces Mₙet = dV/dt as a dynamic condition distinct from V; and derives a formal threshold at which the S/M tension becomes structurally constitutive of a social order. The paper concludes by specifying the conditions that any institutional architecture for maintaining S under omnicommunicative conditions must satisfy, and presents GRECA as a hypothesis of institutional design consistent with those conditions. Keywords: cybernetics; social coordination; pre-deliberative coordination; aesthetic density; requisite variety; Viable System Model; omnicommunication; institutional degradation; gōng/sī; formation theory; political philosophy.
Alberto J. L. Carillo Canán (Thu,) studied this question.