Abstract This paper presents a framework within which an auditing researcher can explicitly investigate human judgment processes and test whether the posited processes, represented in a computer program, explain observed behavior. The various stages of the framework are discussed, with an introduction to the tools and techniques used in each stage. An attempt is made to distinguish academic research in this area from efforts that are developmental in nature.
Bailey et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: