PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 23, 2025Cleaner Engineering and Technology16 citationsOpen Access

Machine learning and thermodynamic modeling for optimizing hydrogen production via algae-biomass co-gasification

View Full Paper
TTThanadol TuntiwongwatTYTakashi YukawaTSThongchai Srinophakun

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The growing demand for sustainable energy has intensified interest in hydrogen (H 2 ) production via biomass co-gasification. This study uniquely integrates thermodynamic modeling with advanced machine learning (ML) techniques to optimize H 2 production and syngas quality from algae-biomass blends—a novel approach that addresses critical gaps in renewable energy production. Three algae species (Chlorella vulgaris, Nannochloropsis oculata, and Fucus serratus) were co-gasified with three biomass types (Fir Pellet (FP), Palm Empty Fruit Bunch (PEFB), and Pellet Pine Wood (PPW)) using a comprehensive Aspen Plus® simulation framework based on Gibbs free energy minimization. Unlike previous research that typically relies on either simulation or experimental methods in isolation, our approach combines Aspen Plus® simulations with six distinct ML algorithms to create a comprehensive predictive framework. Simulations identified optimal conditions, including a gasification temperature (GT) of 800°C and an equivalence ratio (ER) of 0.1–0.5, achieving energy and exergy efficiencies of 87.73% and 84.79%, respectively. The innovative incorporation of algae significantly enhanced H 2 yield and syngas quality, leveraging algae's high reactivity and sustainability benefits. Six ML models—namely Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)—were applied to predict H 2 yield and syngas lower heating value (LHV). XGB demonstrated unprecedented predictive accuracy for H 2 yield, with an R 2 exceeding 0.98 and RMSE of 0.220, while RF excelled in LHV predictions, achieving an R 2 of 0.951 and RMSE of 0.452. This study is the first to identify and quantify the significance of key operational parameters (GT, steam-to-fuel ratio (S/F), ER, and blend in feed (%) (BF (%))) through Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), establishing a novel methodology for optimizing renewable H 2 production that can be adapted across various feedstock combinations, advancing the field of sustainable energy systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tuntiwongwat et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3297c9aa3ef5b669e4880dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2025.101038
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Hydrogen from biomass – Present scenario and future prospects2010 · 819 citations
  2. 2Efficiency improvement of biomass gasifier using porous media heat recuperator2023 · 17 citations
  3. 3Downdraft co-gasification of high ash biomass and plastics2021 · 105 citations
  4. 4Thermodynamic optimization of biomass gasifier for hydrogen production2007 · 180 citations
  5. 5Numerical investigation of optimum operating conditions for syngas and hydrogen production from biomass gasification using Aspen Plus2019 · 199 citations