PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 23, 2026Journal of Intensive Care0 citationsOpen Access

Standardized low-flow ventilation with PEEP maintenance during bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a pilot trial

JUJordan UguetCVCharles‐Hervé VacheronMBMargot Bonnet

Key Points

  • This trial aims to assess the feasibility and safety of a standardized low-flow ventilation protocol during bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
  • Single-center pilot trial with before-and-after design
  • 36 patients in observational phase followed by 35 patients during intervention phase
  • Implemented a ventilation protocol with inspiratory flow rate of 20 L/min and maintained PEEP.
  • PIP decreased from 82 cmH2O to 45 cmH2O (p < 0.001) indicating improved ventilatory mechanics.
  • Time spent with pressure alarms reduced from 24% to 3.4% (p < 0.0001).
  • No significant differences in MV and EtCO2 (p = 0.2 and p = 0.4 respectively).

Abstract

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients can markedly increase airway resistance and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), limit effective tidal volume delivery, and provoke transient hypoxemia, hypercapnia, dynamic hyperinflation, and hemodynamic instability. However, per-procedural ventilator management remains heterogeneous. This single-center trial with before-and-after design assessed the feasibility and safety of implementing a standardized low-flow ventilation protocol, and characterized its physiological effects (particularly peak inspiratory pressure), during bronchoscopy in adults intubated and ventilated in volume-assist-control mode. During the observational phase ( n = 36), ventilator settings reflected usual practice (increased pressure alarm and reduced PEEP; no routine flow reduction). Following a 1-month training period, the intervention phase ( n = 35) implemented an inspiratory flow rate of 20 L/min, unchanged PEEP, and a reduced respiratory rate to achieve an I:E ratio of 1:2. Physiologic and ventilator data were automatically recorded at 1-min intervals. The primary endpoint was peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), a physiological endpoint reflecting the mechanical effect of the intervention. Secondary endpoints included minute ventilation (MV), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), oxygenation metrics, ventilator alarms, and hypotension, feasibility and procedural safety. PIP decreased substantially (45 35, 65 cmH2O vs. 82 59, 93 cmH 2 O; p < 0.001), resulting in a reduction in the time spent with pressure alarms (3.4% vs. 24%; p < 0.0001). However, MV (5.2 4.6, 5.9 L/min vs. 6.4 4.1, 7.3 L/min; p = 0.2), and EtCO2 (36 30, 40 mmHg vs. 31 27, 39 mmHg; p = 0.4) did not differ significantly. PEEP was maintained in the intervention group (8 6, 10 cmH2O vs. 2 0, 5 cmH 2 O; p = 0.001). The protocol was demonstrated short-term procedural safety signals, as average SpO 2 (98.9 93.7, 100.0% vs. 99.9 96.8, 100.0, p = 0.082), and hypotension incidence (8.6% vs. 14%; p = 0.7) did not differ significantly. This protocol implementation study demonstrates that standardized low-flow ventilation with PEEP maintenance is feasible and safe during bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated patients, with a significant reduction in peak inspiratory pressure as a robust mechanical signal. Alveolar ventilation and hemodynamic tolerance were preserved. These findings support the conduct of further research to evaluate clinical outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Uguet et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3a21c7111626ef22ab6781https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-026-00895-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper