Group-mediated cognitive-behavioral intervention and traditional rehab both improved physical function (P<0.001), with greater gains for lower-functioning men in the GMCB group (P<0.01).
RCT (n=147)
randomized
Does a group-mediated cognitive-behavioral intervention improve physical function compared to traditional cardiac rehabilitation in older adults?
Adding a group-mediated cognitive-behavioral intervention to standard cardiac rehabilitation enhances physical function improvements, particularly in lower-functioning patients.
valor p: p=<0.001
PURPOSE: This study contrasted the effect of a group-mediated cognitive-behavioral intervention (GMCB) versus traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CRP) upon changes in objective and self-reported physical function of older adults mean (SD) age of 64.7 (7.5) yr after 3 months of exercise therapy. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial enrolled 147 participants who were eligible for inclusion into cardiac rehabilitation. Baseline to 3-month changes in self-reported and performance related measures of physical function were assessed using a physical functioning questionnaire, a 6-min walk test, and measured MET levels. RESULTS: Paired t-tests revealed that participants made improvements in all measures across the first 3 months of the study, irrespective of group treatment (P 0.05); however, the lower functioning participants in the GMCB intervention experienced greater improvements in self-reported physical function than those in CRP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise therapy is a valuable intervention for improving physical function of older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and those at increased risk for CVD. Baseline level of physical function and gender are important variables to consider when studying the relationship between exercise therapy and improvements in physical function.
Rejeski et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in cardiovascular disease (n=147). Group-mediated cognitive-behavioral intervention (GMCB) vs. Traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CRP) was evaluated on Baseline to 3-month changes in self-reported and performance related measures of physical function (p=<0.001). Group-mediated cognitive-behavioral intervention and traditional rehab both improved physical function (P<0.001), with greater gains for lower-functioning men in the GMCB group (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: