This article examines a puzzle in democratization studies: how Malaysia, under the uninterrupted rule of the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition, pursued a gradual and institutionalized path of political reform prior to its historic 2018 electoral turnover. While dominant theories often emphasize elite rupture, mass mobilization, or electoral turnover, they offer limited insight into cases where democratic transformation evolves within entrenched authoritarian systems. Using a qualitative case study approach, the paper draws on historical institutional analysis and process tracing to explore Malaysia’s political development since the late twentieth century. The analysis focuses on the rise of a politically engaged middle class and situates its role within a broader framework that includes institutional design, party structures, and strategies of regime legitimation. The findings suggest that the new middle class played an active and pragmatic role: promoting democratic participation without undermining systemic stability. This disposition, reinforced by Malaysia’s power-sharing coalition and Westminster-style institutions, supported a slow but sustained expansion of democratic practices. By focusing on Malaysia’s incremental, regime-enduring democratization, the study contributes to debates on hybrid regimes and offers a framework for understanding reform without formal political rupture.
He et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: