PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 4, 2015Circulation38 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy and Safety of Vorapaxar With and Without a Thienopyridine for Secondary Prevention in Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction and No History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

View Full Paper
EBErin A. BohulaPAPhilip E. AylwardMBMarc P. Bonaca

Key Result

Vorapaxar reduced cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke in stable patients with a previous MI, both with planned thienopyridine (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.91) and without (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=16,897)

Blinding

double-blind

Randomization

stratified on the basis of planned thienopyridine use

PICO

P
Population
16,897 stable patients with a previous myocardial infarction in the preceding 2 weeks to 12 months and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attack.
I
Intervention / Comparator
Vorapaxar vs placebo
O
Primary Outcome
composite of cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke — HR 0.80 (0.70-0.91), p=<0.001

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.8 (95% CI 0.7–0.91)

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vorapaxar antagonizes protease-activated receptor 1, the primary receptor for thrombin on human platelets, and reduces recurrent thrombotic events in stable patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI). We wished to determine whether the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet therapy with vorapaxar was modified by concurrent thienopyridine use. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 50 (TRA 2°P-TIMI 50) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vorapaxar in 26,449 patients with previous atherothrombosis. This prespecified analysis included 16,897 patients who qualified with a MI in the preceding 2 weeks to 12 months and was restricted to patients without a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack given its contraindication in that population. Randomization was stratified on the basis of planned thienopyridine use. Thienopyridine was planned at randomization in 12,410 (73%). Vorapaxar significantly reduced the composite of cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke in comparison with placebo regardless of planned thienopyridine therapy (planned thienopyridine, hazard ratio, 0.80, 0.70-0.91, P<0.001; no planned thienopyridine, hazard ratio, 0.75; 0.60-0.94, P=0.011; P-interaction=0.67). Findings were similar when patients were stratified by actual thienopyridine use at baseline (P-interaction=0.82) and through 18 months (P-interaction=0.44). Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) moderate or severe bleeding risk was increased with vorapaxar and was not significantly altered by planned thienopyridine (planned, hazard ratio, 1.50; 1.18-1.89, P<0.001; no planned, hazard ratio, 1.90, 1.17-3.07, P=0.009; P-interaction=0.37) or actual thienopyridine use (P-interaction=0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Vorapaxar reduced cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke in stable patients with a history of previous MI, whether treated concomitantly with a thienopyridine or not. The relative risk of moderate or severe bleeding was similarly increased irrespective of thienopyridine use. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00526474.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bohula et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in previous myocardial infarction (n=16,897). Vorapaxar vs. placebo was evaluated on composite of cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.91, p=<0.001). Vorapaxar reduced cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke in stable patients with a previous MI, both with planned thienopyridine (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.91) and without (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4d94326c3ae3769c077c9chttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.015042
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper