PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 17, 2026European journal of psychotraumatology0 citationsOpen Access

Resilience Evaluation Scale: translation and psychometric validation in Brazilian Portuguese

View Full Paper
BCBruno Messina CoimbraABAlice Einloft BrunnetCKChristian Haag Kristensen

Key Points

  • The aim was to translate and validate the Resilience Evaluation Scale for use in Brazil, focusing on its factorial structure and psychometric properties.
  • Translated the Resilience Evaluation Scale into Brazilian Portuguese and conducted an online survey with 355 participants.
  • Performed confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the factorial structure and assessed internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha.
  • Evaluated construct validity through Spearman’s correlations with psychological distress measures.
  • The Brazilian RES replicated the two-factor structure with good model fit (CFI = 0.975, TLI = 0.965).
  • Internal consistency was good with α = 0.87 for the overall scale and α = 0.79 for Self-Efficacy.
  • RES scores were negatively correlated with psychological distress measures, all p values < 0.01.

Abstract

Background: Potentially traumatic events (PTEs) are highly prevalent in Brazil. Resilience is a key psychological factor in adaptive responses following PTEs. The Resilience Evaluation Scale (RES) is a brief instrument to assess resilience not yet validated in Brazil. The original RES demonstrated a two-factor structure (Self-Efficacy and Self-Confidence), although further studies have reported mixed findings regarding its factor structure.Objective: We aimed to translate and validate the RES by examining its factorial structure, reliability, and construct validity in a Brazilian general population sample.Methods: The RES was translated into Brazilian Portuguese and administered via an online survey alongside measures of psychological distress. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the factorial structure. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach’s alpha, inter-item correlations, and corrected item–total correlations. Construct validity was assessed using Spearman’s correlations between RES scores and psychological distress measures.Results: A total of 355 participants were included (mean age = 38.96 years; 78.3% female; 87.3% reported lifetime PTE exposure). The mean RES total score was 23.85 (SD = 6.31). The Brazilian RES replicated the original two-factor structure (Self-Efficacy and Self-Confidence) with acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.975, TLI = 0.965, SRMR = 0.047, RMSEA = 0.098). Internal consistency was good (α = .87), with α = .79 for Self-Efficacy and α = .87 for Self-Confidence. RES scores were negatively associated with psychological distress (all ps < .01).Conclusion: The Brazilian RES demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, supporting its use as a measure of resilience in the Brazilian general population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coimbra et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a59c5e4a58755010b471275https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2692765
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper