PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 19, 2026International Journal of Dermatology1 citations

The Dermatologic Burden of Flooding: A Systematic Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Management in a Warming World

View Full Paper
JJJ. JaraJAJaime David Acosta-EspañaLZLysien I. Zambrano

Key Points

  • This review aims to detail the dermatologic burdens caused by flooding amid climate change and their management.
  • Conducted a systematic review of 12 epidemiological studies from diverse countries.
  • Rigorous appraisal of over 71 million patient encounters using JBI Critical Appraisal tools.
  • Characterized flood-associated dermatoses into three clinical categories.
  • No significant increase in Staphylococcus aureus infections observed in high-resource settings.
  • Incidence of acute atopic dermatitis flares was linked to flood-associated humidity and wind, with OR 1.14.
  • Overcrowded shelters led to a delayed surge of communicable infestations, like scabies, approximately one week post-disaster.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Anthropogenic climate change has intensified the frequency of catastrophic flooding, contributing to a complex array of public health challenges. Although acute trauma dominates the initial response, the post‐disaster dermatological burden remains an under‐reported driver of morbidity. This systematic review characterizes the pathophysiology of flood‐associated dermatoses into three clinical categories: water‐contact injuries, displacement‐related conditions, and environmental aeroallergen‐induced exacerbations. We conducted a systematic, mechanistic synthesis of 12 epidemiological studies (including retrospective cohorts, time‐series, and case‐crossover designs) from the USA, Brazil, France, Pakistan, China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Cambodia, and South Korea. Spanning over 71 million patient encounters, the data were rigorously appraised using JBI Critical Appraisal tools. Analysis reveals three distinct clinical phases. First, in high‐resource settings, data indicate no significant increase in Staphylococcus aureus infections, although mucosal risks (e.g., leptospirosis, Aeromonas ) and chemical irritant dermatitis are observed. Second, flood‐associated humidity and wind independently drive acute atopic dermatitis flares (odds ratio OR 1.14) and allergic rhinitis, independent of direct water contact. Third, shelter overcrowding drives a delayed surge of communicable infestations (e.g., scabies, pediculosis) approximately 1 week post‐disaster. Flood‐associated skin conditions are heterogeneous. Preparedness requires moving from non‐specific antibiotic prophylaxis to a stratified response involving targeted mucosal monitoring, ectoparasite control in shelters, and anti‐inflammatory therapy for atopic populations. image

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jara et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5c6a7e118b92953e3ee73bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.70562
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of flooding events on waterborne and vector-borne infections: a systematic review.2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Water-related diseases following flooding in South Asian countries – a healthcare crisis2024 · 15 citations
  3. 3Flood Risk Management and Health Consequences: a case-study of the 2021 floods in Germany2024
  4. 4Integrated molecular and risk-based assessment of microbial hazards during catastrophic urban flooding2025
  5. 5Integrated molecular and risk-based assessment of microbial hazards during catastrophic urban flooding2025