Axillary blockade significantly increased pulse arrival time for all reference points, with no significant difference in mean pulse arrival time between both arms.
Observational (n=34)
Does axillary block-induced vasodilation alter pulse arrival time compared to baseline in patients?
Pulse arrival time shows no significant difference between arms and increases significantly following vasodilation, supporting its use for intra-subject comparison.
The propagation time of arterial pulse waves provides information about arterial stiffness. Pulse arrival time (PAT) is calculated as the time between the R-wave (ECG) and three reference points on photoplethysmographic (PPG) pulse waves: foot, first derivative and peak. Because large variation in PAT-values between patients exists, measurements of the contra-lateral arm as reference could be a solution. However, anatomical differences between arteries of the arms could introduce an offset of PAT. Furthermore, when arterial stiffness decreases (e.g. after axillary blockade (AxB)) and pulse wave amplitude increases (vasodilation), the pulse waveform can change. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference between the PAT of both arms and to evaluate the effect of vasodilation after AxB on PAT. ECG and PPG was measured on both hands in 34 patients, starting 2 min before the injection of local anaesthetic of an AxB and continuing for a period of 30 min after block placement. PAT of the baseline and after AxB were calculated and compared. The mean-PAT of both arms were not significantly different for the three reference points. After AxB, PAT significantly increased for all reference points. PAT can be used for intra-subject comparison.
Kortekaas et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Patients undergoing axillary blockade (n=34). Axillary blockade (AxB) vs. Baseline (before AxB) and contra-lateral arm was evaluated on Pulse arrival time (PAT) difference between arms and effect of vasodilation after AxB. Axillary blockade significantly increased pulse arrival time for all reference points, with no significant difference in mean pulse arrival time between both arms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: