Doubling the epirubicin dose to 120 mg/m2 in the FEC regimen did not significantly improve response rate or overall quality of life, but prolonged time to progression (19.2 vs 13.1 months, p=0.04).
RCT (n=74)
randomized
Sí
Does doubling the epirubicin dose in the FEC regimen improve response rate and quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer?
Doubling the epirubicin dose in the FEC regimen for metastatic breast cancer did not improve response rate or overall quality of life, but did prolong time to progression and improve specific QoL domains like pain and body image.
In metastatic breast cancer (MBC) doubling the epirubicin (EPI) dose intensity (DI) within the FEC (5-fluorouracil, EPI, cyclophosphamide) regimen could increase the response rate (RR) and ameliorate the quality of life (QoL) over standard FEC. From May, 1995, 74 consecutive patients with MBC were randomly treated with 6 courses of two FEC regimens containing 60 (60FEC) or 120 (120FEC, supported by primary G-CSF) mg/m2 of EPI. Drugs were administered every 21 days. The QoL was assessed over and after treatment by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (VER 2.0) and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires, compiled by the patient, and the Spitzer's QL-index, compiled by the physician. The study was prematurely closed in May, 1997, due to RR and QoL data of 4th interim analysis. The delivered EPI DI was 20.0 and 37.9 mg/m2/week in 60- and in 120FEC, respectively. Among the two regimens, there was no statistically significant difference in RR or in improvement of baseline overall QoL. With respect to 60FEC patients, the 120FEC patients had longer time to progression (19.2 vs 13.1 mos, p=0.04). Over baseline, the 120- but not the 60FEC patients had significantly greater pain decrease and lower deterioration of body image. In MBC, both 60- and 120FEC regimens furnished the same RR and improvement in overall baseline QoL. With respect to 60FEC patients, the 120FEC patients experienced longer time to progression. Over baseline, pain decrease and preservation of body image were also greater in these patients.
Riccardi et al. (Sat,) conducted a rct in metastatic breast cancer (n=74). FEC regimen with 120 mg/m2 epirubicin (120FEC) vs. FEC regimen with 60 mg/m2 epirubicin (60FEC) was evaluated on Response rate (RR) and quality of life (QoL). Doubling the epirubicin dose to 120 mg/m2 in the FEC regimen did not significantly improve response rate or overall quality of life, but prolonged time to progression (19.2 vs 13.1 months, p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: