Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Sir, Four families of transporters have previously been described that contain multidrug efflux systems: the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), the small multidrug resistance (SMR) family, the resistance/nodulation/cell division (RND) family and the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily. The MFS, SMR and RND families consist of secondary transporters, typically energized by the proton-motive force (pmf), and the ABC superfamily comprises ATP-dependent transporters (Paulsen et al., 1996, Microbiol Rev60: 575–608). Recently, two new multidrug efflux proteins have been identified, NorM from Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and a homologue in E. coli, YdhE (Morita et al., 1998, Antimicrob Agents Chemother42: 1778–1782). These two proteins mediate resistance to a range of cationic dyes, aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, probably via a pmf-dependent efflux mechanism. NorM and YdhE have 12 predicted transmembrane segments (TMS) and on this basis have been suggested to be members of the MFS (Morita et al., 1998, ibid.). However, our analyses have demonstrated that these proteins do not share significant sequence similarity with any member of the MFS and do not exhibit any of the signature sequences specific to the 18 families of the MFS identified by Pao et al., 1998 (Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 62: 1–34). We have found that NorM and YdhE are members of a previously unidentified family, which contains more than 30 proteins, including representatives from all three kingdoms of life (Eukarya, Archaea and Eubacteria). Statistical analyses evaluated by binary comparisons revealed significant amino acid sequence similarity between NorM and all of the other members of the family (9 ≤ Z ≤ 82; Lipman and Pearson, 1985, Science227: 1435–1441). The proteins in this family range in size from 363 to 1141 residues, and hydropathy analyses revealed that they characteristically possess 12 putative TMS (Fig. 1A). Multiple sequence alignments indicated that their most highly conserved regions are located in the vicinity of TMS 5 and 6, and near the terminus of TMS 8 (Fig. 1B). A. Average hydropathy plot for NorM and its homologues, based on the multiple sequence alignment used to construct the tree shown in C below. The plot was derived using a sliding window of 21 residues and the hydrophobicity scale of Kyte and Doolittle, 1982 (J. Mol Biol 157: 105–132). The locations of the 12 predicted TMS are indicated. B. Multiple sequence alignment of the most conserved regions of NorM with representative homologues. The protein designations used list the protein name and a three-letter organism abbreviation. The hatched boxes represent the predicted positions of TMS. Amino acid numbering is shown at both ends of the sequence presented. Identical residues are indicated by the boxed shading. C. Unrooted phylogenetic tree for NorM and its 31 homologues, the three clusters are delineated and numbered. The tree was prepared using the PHYLIP package (Felsenstein, 1989, Cladistics 5: 164–166). The protein abbreviations used are as described in B above. Extensive phylogenetic studies of more than 70 families of transport proteins (Paulsen et al., 1998, J Mol Biol277: 573–592; Saier, 1998, Adv Microbiol Physiol, 40: 81–136) has revealed that transporter substrate specificity typically correlates with phylogeny, and hence such analyses provide a credible foundation for making functional predictions. Phylogenetic analysis of this family revealed the presence of three distinct clusters (clusters 1, 2 and 3 in Fig. 1C), implying that these three clusters may differ functionally in some respect. The first of these clusters includes the bacterial multidrug efflux proteins NorM and YdhE, as well as hypothetical proteins from Haemophilus, Bacillus and Synechocystis. The branching pattern of these proteins parallels the lineage of their respective organisms, indicating that they are likely to be orthologues, and may consequently all be drug/multidrug efflux proteins. The constituents of the second cluster are exclusively eukaryotic proteins, from either fungi or plants. The one functionally characterized member of this cluster, the yeast Erc1 protein, confers resistance to the methionine analogue ethionine (Shiomi et al., 1991, J. Ferment Bioeng71: 211–215). Although the mechanism of resistance mediated by Erc1 has not been established, it is plausible that Erc1 and the other members of this cluster are eukaryotic transporters. The third cluster includes the DinF proteins from E. coli and Streptococcus pneumoniae and homologues of these proteins from Eubacteria and Archaea. In contrast to cluster 1, the branching pattern of the proteins within this cluster does not correlate with their respective organismal phylogeny, indicating that this cluster includes a number of paralogous proteins. The functions of the two DinF proteins are unknown, but expression of both of them has been demonstrated to be DNA damage-inducible (Mortier-Barrière et al., 1998, Mol Microbiol27: 159–170; Thoms and Wackernagel, 1987, J Bacteriol169: 1731–1736). It is tempting to speculate they may be stress-induced efflux proteins of unknown specificity; whether this is a common feature of proteins in this cluster remains to be explored. Based on the currently available sequences, the recently described NorM multidrug efflux protein is manifestly not a member of the MFS, but instead is the prototype of a new family of transporters, which we have termed the MATE (multidrug and toxic compound extrusion) family. This represents a significant new finding in the field of multidrug efflux, as for several years it has been thought that there were only four transporter families that included multidrug efflux systems. The inclusion of E. coli DinF and its homologues in this family provides an exciting new insight into the function of this SOS-response protein, potentially implicating it in the efflux of DNA damage-inducing compounds. The MATE family appears to represent a family of transport proteins responsible for protecting cells from drugs and other toxic compounds, although the physiological role of most of its 32 members remains to be elucidated.
Brown et al. (Fri,) studied this question.