PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2001Radiology72 citations

Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of Coronary Arteries: Comparison of Intra- and Extravascular Contrast Agents in Swine

View Full Paper
DLDebiao LiJZJie ZhengHWHanns‐Joachim Weinmann

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of an intravascular contrast agent, gadomer-17, in improving magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of coronary arteries with that of an extravascular agent, gadopentetate dimeglumine, in pigs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight pigs underwent imaging after three injections: 0.20 mmol of gadopentetate dimeglumine per kilogram of body weight and 0.05 and 0.10 mmol/kg gadomer-17. Coronary images were acquired repeatedly after each injection by using an inversion-recovery-prepared segmented three-dimensional sequence with either breath holding (n = 4) or respiratory gating (n = 4). Coronary artery-to-myocardium contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were compared between injections. RESULTS: At breath-hold imaging, substantial CNR improvement over precontrast images was observed in images acquired during the first pass of gadopentetate dimeglumine in coronary arteries and up to 6 and 10 minutes after 0.05 and 0.10 mmol/kg of gadomer-17 injections, respectively. The CNR with 0.10 mmol/kg of gadomer-17 was 20% (P <.05) higher than that with gadopentetate dimeglumine at first-pass imaging. At respiratory-gated imaging, significant CNR improvement (P <.05) over precontrast images was observed in images acquired up to 10, 30, and 50 minutes after gadopentetate dimeglumine and both gadomer-17 injections, respectively. The CNR on the first images obtained after 0.10 mmol/kg gadomer-17 injection was 168% (P <.05) higher than that on the images obtained after gadopentetate dimeglumine injection. CONCLUSION: Gadomer-17 provided greater and more persistent CNR improvements than did gadopentetate dimeglumine; further evaluation of its utility for coronary imaging in humans is warranted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f54c7ce524a4339c34d73https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr03670
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper