PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1993Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology22 citations

NG-Monomethyl-l-ARG Reduces the Forearm Vasodilator Response to Acetylcholine but Not to Methacholine in Humans

View Full Paper
GRGerard A. RongenPSPaul SmitsTTTheo Thien

Structured PICO

Does L-NMMA-acetate differentially affect the forearm vasodilator response to acetylcholine versus methacholine in healthy male volunteers?

P
Population
12 healthy male volunteers divided into two groups (A and B, n=6 each)
I
Intervention
Local administration of NO-synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine acetate (L-NMMA-acetate) during infusion of methacholine (0.03, 0.3, and 1 micrograms/100 ml forearm/min; group A) or acetylcholine (0.5, 2, and 8 micrograms/100 ml forearm/min; group B)
C
Comparator
Infusion of methacholine or acetylcholine alone (baseline response prior to L-NMMA administration)
O
Outcome
Forearm vasodilator response (measured by forearm vascular resistance and forearm blood flow)surrogate

Nitric oxide contributes to acetylcholine-induced vasodilation but not methacholine-induced vasodilation in the human forearm.

Abstract

We compared the contribution of nitric oxide (NO) in methacholine (MCh)- and acetylcholine (ACh)-induced vasodilation using the NO-synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine acetate (L-NMMA-acetate) in two groups (A and B) of 6 healthy male volunteers. The left brachial artery was cannulated for drug infusion and recording of mean arterial pressure (MAP). Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured on both sides by venous occlusion mercury-in-silastic strain-gauge plethysmography. All measurements were performed with occluded hand circulation. Forearm vasodilator response to three increasing dosages of MCh (0.03, 0.3, and 1 micrograms/100 ml forearm/min; group A) or ACh (0.5, 2, and 8 micrograms/100 ml forearm/min; group B) was studied first. Forty-five minutes later, these infusions were repeated (after and during local administration of L-NMMA). L-NMMA-acetate infusion alone increased basal forearm vascular resistance (FVR, mean +/- SE) by 86.2 +/- 14.5 and 99.5 +/- 27.4% in groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.05) without significant FVR changes in the control arm. MCh-induced vasodilation was not attenuated by concomitant L-NMMA-acetate infusion. In contrast, L-NMMA-acetate significantly reduced the averaged percentage decrease in FVR during infusion of ACh from 55.7 +/- 9.1 to 35.4 +/- 11.8% (p < 0.05). L-NMMA-acetate increased basal vascular tone and reduced the vasodilator response to ACh. MCh induced vasodilation to a degree similar to that obtained with ACh. Nevertheless, MCh-induced vasodilation could not be attenuated by L-NMMA, suggesting that NO contributes differentially to methacholine- and ACh-induced vasodilation in humans.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rongen et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a73a36e6f409f81651af597https://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-199312000-00017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper