PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 21, 2007Journal of Clinical Microbiology18 citationsOpen Access

Shedding and Reversion of Oral Polio Vaccine Type 3 in Mexican Vaccinees: Comparison of Mutant Analysis by PCR and Enzyme Cleavage to a Real-Time PCR Assay

DGDevasena GnanashanmugamMFMeira S. Falkovitz‐HalpernADAnthony Dodge

Structured PICO

Does a real-time PCR assay improve the detection and quantification of OPV3 reversion compared to MAPREC in stool samples from OPV vaccinees?

P
Population
73 stool samples from 11 oral polio vaccine (OPV) vaccinees in Rio Blanco, Mexico
I
Intervention
Real-time PCR assay
C
Comparator
MAPREC (mutant analysis by PCR and enzyme cleavage) method
O
Outcome
Detection of OPV3 and estimation of revertant proportion (RP)surrogate

Real-time PCR is a rapid, efficient, and more sensitive alternative to MAPREC for detecting OPV3 and estimating reversion rates, which is useful for global polio eradication monitoring.

Abstract

A uracil-to-cytosine mutation at nucleotide position 472 of oral poliovirus vaccine type 3 (OPV3) contributes to the development of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP). To analyze OPV3 shedding patterns, we previously used the multistep method of mutant analysis by PCR and enzyme cleavage (MAPREC). This involves conventional reverse transcription-PCR to detect OPV3, followed by a restriction digest to quantify position 472 reversion. Real-time PCR detects and quantifies nucleic acid as PCR occurs and avoids postreaction processing. The goal of this study was to compare a real-time PCR method to MAPREC. Seventy-three stool samples from Mexican OPV recipients underwent the reverse transcription-PCR step of MAPREC and real-time PCR. Real-time PCR identified 23% more OPV3-positive samples than conventional reverse transcription-PCR. When reversion was compared, the revertant proportion (RP), defined as the percentage of revertants in a sample, differed by 10% were obtained within 5 days of OPV administration. The real-time PCR assay identified samples with an RP of > or =85% with 94% sensitivity and 86% specificity compared to MAPREC. The mean difference in RP between the two methods was 3.6% (95% confidence interval, -0.3 to 7.5%). Real-time PCR methods reliably detect OPV3, and reversion estimates correlate more consistently with MAPREC when OPV3 reversion rates are high. Detecting VAPP-related mutations by real-time PCR is rapid and efficient and can be useful in monitoring ongoing global polio eradication efforts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gnanashanmugam et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7609299c92392688b26cf4https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.02268-06
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper