PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 27, 2008New England Journal of Medicine970 citationsOpen Access

Aspirin and Extended-Release Dipyridamole versus Clopidogrel for Recurrent Stroke

View Full Paper
Ralph L. Sacco
Ralph L. SaccoKanazawa University
HDHans‐Christoph DienerPreventive Cardiology
Salim Yusuf
Salim YusufPopulation Health Research Institute

Structured PICO

Does aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole compared to clopidogrel reduce recurrent stroke in patients with prior ischemic stroke?

P
Population
20,332 patients with ischemic stroke
I
Intervention
Aspirin 25 mg plus extended-release dipyridamole 200 mg twice daily
C
Comparator
Clopidogrel 75 mg daily
O
Outcome
First recurrence of strokehard clinical

Aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole and clopidogrel resulted in similar rates of recurrent stroke, but ASA-ERDP was associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhagic events.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrent stroke is a frequent, disabling event after ischemic stroke. This study compared the efficacy and safety of two antiplatelet regimens--aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole (ASA-ERDP) versus clopidogrel. METHODS: In this double-blind, 2-by-2 factorial trial, we randomly assigned patients to receive 25 mg of aspirin plus 200 mg of extended-release dipyridamole twice daily or to receive 75 mg of clopidogrel daily. The primary outcome was first recurrence of stroke. The secondary outcome was a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from vascular causes. Sequential statistical testing of noninferiority (margin of 1.075), followed by superiority testing, was planned. RESULTS: A total of 20,332 patients were followed for a mean of 2.5 years. Recurrent stroke occurred in 916 patients (9.0%) receiving ASA-ERDP and in 898 patients (8.8%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.92 to 1.11). The secondary outcome occurred in 1333 patients (13.1%) in each group (hazard ratio for ASA-ERDP, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.07). There were more major hemorrhagic events among ASA-ERDP recipients (419 4.1%) than among clopidogrel recipients (365 3.6%) (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.32), including intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.83). The net risk of recurrent stroke or major hemorrhagic event was similar in the two groups (1194 ASA-ERDP recipients 11.7%, vs. 1156 clopidogrel recipients 11.4%; hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.11). CONCLUSIONS: The trial did not meet the predefined criteria for noninferiority but showed similar rates of recurrent stroke with ASA-ERDP and with clopidogrel. There is no evidence that either of the two treatments was superior to the other in the prevention of recurrent stroke. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00153062.)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sacco et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7c977611282ab5d4ba492chttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0805002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper