PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 2, 2023Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine6 citationsOpen Access

Mid-term changes in cognitive functions in patients with atrial fibrillation: a longitudinal analysis of the Swiss-AF cohort

AWAlexandra S. WueestPZPriska ZuberMCMichael Coslovsky

Key Result

Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was associated with smaller longitudinal increases in cognitive scores, including the Cognitive Construct Score (difference in annual change -0.03), compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=2,415)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation increase longitudinal cognitive decline compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
2,415 patients with atrial fibrillation (mean age 73.2 years, 27.4% female) were followed for a median of 3.97 years to assess longitudinal changes in cognitive functions.
E
Exposure
Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (persistent or permanent)
C
Comparator
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
O
Outcome
Longitudinal changes in cognitive functions (measured by MoCA, TMT-A, TMT-B, SF, DSST, and CoCo) and time to cognitive drop (score ≥1 standard deviation below baseline) over a median follow-up of 3.97 yearssurrogate

In patients with atrial fibrillation, cognitive scores generally improved over time due to practice effects, but smaller improvements in non-paroxysmal AF patients may indicate subtle cognitive decline compared to paroxysmal AF.

Main Result

Mean Difference: -0.03 (95% CI -0.04–-0.01)

Absolute Event Rate: 0.11% vs 0.14%

Limitations

  • Lack of a control group without atrial fibrillation to understand the role of AF itself.
  • Some cognitive tests were not performed in the patient's mother tongue.
  • Missing data occurred, especially at follow-up 4 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Study design did not allow for full statistical control of practice effects since time of follow-up and testing coincided.
  • Potential attrition bias where healthiest participants remain in the study
  • Practice effects from repeated cognitive testing masking true cognitive decline

Abstract

Background: Longitudinal association studies of atrial fibrillation (AF) and cognitive functions have shown an unclear role of AF-type and often differ in methodological aspects. We therefore aim to investigate longitudinal changes in cognitive functions in association with AF-type (non-paroxysmal vs. paroxysmal) and comorbidities in the Swiss-AF cohort. Methods: Seven cognitive measures were administered up to five times between 2014 and 2022. Age-education standardized scores were calculated and association between longitudinal change in scores and baseline AF-type investigated using linear mixed-effects models. Associations between AF-type and time to cognitive drop, an observed score of at least one standard deviation below individual's age-education standardized cognitive scores at baseline, were studied using Cox proportional hazard models of each cognitive test, censoring patients at their last measurement. Models were adjusted for baseline covariates. Results: 2,415 AF patients (mean age 73.2 years; 1,080 paroxysmal, 1,335 non-paroxysmal AF) participated in this Swiss multicenter prospective cohort study. Mean cognitive scores increased longitudinally (median follow-up 3.97 years). Non-paroxysmal AF patients showed smaller longitudinal increases in Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Cognitive Construct Score (CoCo)and Trail Making Test part B (TMT-B) scores vs. paroxysmal AF patients. Diabetes, history of stroke/TIA and depression were associated with worse performance on all cognitive tests. No differences in time to cognitive drop were observed between AF-types in any cognitive test. Conclusion: This study indicated preserved cognitive functioning in AF patients, best explained by practice effects. Smaller practice effects were found in non-paroxysmal AF patients in the DSST, TMT-B and the CoCo and could indicate a marker of subtle cognitive decline. As diabetes, history of stroke/TIA and depression-but not AF-type-were associated with cognitive drop, more attention should be given to risk factors and underlying mechanisms of AF.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wueest et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=2,415). Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation vs. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Longitudinal change in Cognitive Construct (CoCo) score (annual increase) (MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.04, -0.01). Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was associated with smaller longitudinal increases in cognitive scores, including the Cognitive Construct Score (difference in annual change -0.03), compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a805934cf96de1eb9c87561https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1212587
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper