Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring detected a 50% rate of blood pressure control compared to 25% with office measurement, and identified white-coat or masked hypertension in one-third of patients.
Observational
Sí
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring improve the detection of true hypertension control compared to office blood pressure measurement in daily clinical practice?
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is essential in clinical practice as it reveals that one-third of patients have white-coat or masked hypertension, and actual control rates are double those estimated by office measurements.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 50% vs 25%
Many patients are hypertensive at the medical settings but show normal blood pressure out of the doctor's office, and are classified as white-coat hypertensives. On the other hand, many patients with controlled hypertension at the clinic show ambulatory blood pressure levels above the thresholds considered for an adequate blood pressure control, known as having masked hypertension. Using data from the Spanish Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry (Spanish ABPM Registry), a national program developed to promote the use of the ambulatory technique for hypertension management in daily practice, we have reviewed the main strengths of this approach, that is the ability to detect discrepancies of blood pressure status with respect to office blood pressure measurement, and to better assess accurate rates of hypertension control. White-coat hypertension within patients with elevated office blood pressure, and masked hypertension within office-controlled patients affected one of three patients in each office status. On the other hand, rates of ambulatory blood pressure control (50%) doubled those of office blood pressure control (25%), still remaining half the patients uncontrolled. We think that a systematic use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and strategies to improve blood pressure control constitute key priorities in hypertension management.
Gorostidi et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Hypertension. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring vs. Office blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Blood pressure control. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring detected a 50% rate of blood pressure control compared to 25% with office measurement, and identified white-coat or masked hypertension in one-third of patients.