PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1991Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery79 citations

Low-molecular-weight heparinoid compared with warfarin for prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis in patients who are operated on for fracture of the hip. A prospective, randomized trial.

View Full Paper
TGTobin N. GerhartHYHarris S. YettLRLinda K. Robertson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In a randomized, prospective trial, a low-molecular-weight heparinoid (Org 10172 Lomoparan) was compared with warfarin for efficacy and safety in preventing deep-vein thrombosis in 263 patients who had an operatively treated fracture of the hip. One group of patients received Org 10172 in a dose of 750 units subcutaneously every twelve hours until the ninth postoperative day; on the seventh postoperative day, warfarin was added to the regimen. The other group received only warfarin. Both drugs were begun preoperatively, immediately after the admission evaluation. In the patients who received warfarin, the desired prothrombin time was one and one-half times the control level. Deep-vein thrombosis was detected by 125I-fibrinogen scanning and impedance plethysmography and was confirmed by phlebography and compression ultrasonography. Deep-vein thrombosis was found in nine (7 per cent) of the 132 patients who received Org 10172 and in twenty-eight (21 per cent) of the 131 patients who received warfarin (p less than 0.001). Adverse reactions were not significantly different in the two groups. Major bleeding complications occurred in eight patients in the Org-10172 group, only four of whom were receiving the drug at the time of bleeding, and in five patients who were receiving warfarin (not significant). There was no difference in intraoperative loss of blood or in requirements for transfusion. We concluded that the low-molecular-weight heparinoid Org 10172 is a safe, convenient, effective antithrombotic agent for the prevention of venous thrombosis after an operation for fracture of the hip.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gerhart et al. (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8ab324754a5a619a725ab9https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199173040-00003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (Enoxaparin) to Prevent Deep-Vein Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Elective Hip Surgery1986 · 527 citations
  2. 2A Prospective Double-blind Trial of a Low Molecular Weight Heparin Once Daily Compared with Conventional Low-dose Heparin Three Times Daily to Prevent Pulmonary Embolism and Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Hip Fracture1989 · 82 citations
  3. 3A Comparison of Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin with Warfarin Sodium for Prophylaxis against Deep-Vein Thrombosis after Hip or Knee Implantation1993 · 441 citations
  4. 4Orgaran (Org 10172) or Heparin for Preventing Venous Thrombosis after Elective Surgery for Malignant Disease? A Double-Blind, Randomised, Multicentre Comparison1993 · 61 citations
  5. 5Thromboembolic prophylaxis in total hip replacement: A comparison between the low molecular weight heparinoid Lomoparan and heparindihydroergotamine1992 · 37 citations