PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2006Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research44 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in young patients with acute MI: does the Framingham Risk Score underestimate cardiovascular risk in this population?

SZStuart ZarichCLCarlo LucianoJHJackie Hulford

Structured PICO

Does the Framingham Risk Score underestimate cardiovascular risk in young patients with acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
165 consecutive subjects who presented with acute myocardial infarction prior to 45 years of age.
O
Outcome
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and estimates of global risk by Framingham Risk Score

The Framingham Risk Score appears to underestimate global cardiovascular risk in young patients with premature myocardial infarction, despite a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome.

Abstract

To assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and estimates of global risk by Framingham Risk Score in young subjects with acute myocardial infarction (MI), we assessed metabolic parameters and global risk assessment in 165 consecutive subjects who presented with myocardial infarction prior to 45 years of age. Nearly 80% of subjects were overweight or obese and at least one cardiovascular risk factor was present in 96% of patients. MS with or without overt diabetes was present in nearly two thirds of subjects. Excluding subjects with diabetes, the mean 10-year Framingham Risk Score estimate in the total cohort was 9.3%, with only 17.1% of subjects having a 10-year risk greater than 20%. Only 28% of subjects with MS had a Framingham Risk Score greater than 20%. Although MS is present in nearly two thirds of young patients with premature myocardial infarction, the Framingham Risk Score appears to underestimate global cardiovascular risk in this population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zarich et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8c16d922230c1854fb59e0https://doi.org/10.3132/dvdr.2006.012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper